newspool

Which is worst: NATO or AIDS?

In Afasia's corner... on June 9, 2012 at 11:48 am

NATO force commander John Allen apologies for killing 18 civilian on last Wednesday! Easy taken. We are sorry for killing you continuously since 1978 by changing roles and actors.

Casualties and losses : Some estimates as high as 5,600,000 killed(wikipedia)

How many of those are civilians? Who  knows? Who can tell how many children die each week? Who can explain how many girls have been raped? Almost 6 million dead for a forgotten proposal? Do you remember why our soldiers are there? Do you remember the reason why Soviet Union declared war for the first time?

Let me try to remind you this shift changing from Soviets to Americans and then to NATO.

First Soviets invaded Afghanistan to keep People’s Democratic Party of Afghanistan in power which actually took the power by a military coup. Of course people were angry in the street because of Soviet Invasion. As always and thanks to god, our saver in all bad situations, United States of America with their puppet Pakistan helped Afghanistan against Soviets. Died thousands in this not understandable war. All those were happening due to sold leaders of the Middle East zone. None of them were as lucky as Turkish for not having their own Ataturk to help them out against enemies. Instead of having 1 Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, they had thousand of Gulbudin Hekmatiar who is not easy to understand for which side he was fighting for. Extreme communist sported by USSR, than extreme Islamic as prime minister of Afghanistan, Mujahideen leader of the war between Afghan groups and lately as a terrorist fighting against NATO. I have no words to say for those shape shifters. Shortly USSR powers left the country and backed again as Russia to Afghanistan but not officially, only helping to the government of Najibullah and left again but this time they left country into taliban hands. Soviet Russia the protector of Communism decided to leave a EXTREMELY ISLAMIC RULED Afghanistan. Great deal isn’t it. They came to help communist party. How successful they were.

At 2001, the biggest enemy and the biggest ally of Russia took Russia’s place and came as their replacement. Yes, USA!.. This time the reason was? Some one can remember the reason? Ahh of course! After 11 September, USA decided to go there specially to Afghanistan to clean the zone from terrorists. It was a “VERY SUCCESSFUL” operation too. Wasn’t it? They have “CLEANED” and “DEFEATED” all terrorists of al-Qaeda(which currently chooses a new leader) and Taliban. In their time of stay died many many poor young Afghan soldier + US soldier + many other countries poor young child died on this dirty, ugly game of throne.

Now it’s NATO’s turn. Keeping the country save by killing civilians. Fighting against some unknown self created groups of people(I doubt if they are Afghans creating this chaos in the country) and while trying to push them out resulting lots an lots of civil death. Which actually worst than both 2 countries. They were there for their benefits. But NATO? What is their benefits? Do they really kill civilians for some good proposal?

And now I am wondering. Who s the next?


Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: